← Search

Andrea Bailey

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 41W–43L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Andrea Bailey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
W
2025-10-25 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeremy Bailey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-10-19 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeremy Bailey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-14 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeremy Bailey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-08-03 · Kemple-Ball Busters · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lara Greenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-07-28 · Kemple-Ball Busters · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Roach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
Caitlin Hennessy / Hector Hernandez
2025-07-13 · #1 Doubles · with Jeremy Bailey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-12 · #1 Doubles · with Jeremy Bailey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Jeremy Bailey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-06-30 · Kemple-Ball Busters · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jinmi Kemple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-06-24 · Kemple-Ball Busters · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Roach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-06-21 · SAC-Hummel/Brady · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natasha Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-05-26 · Andrea Bailey · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
48.5%
16W–17L · 51.1% of games
3.0
43.2%
16W–21L · 46.6% of games
2.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 67.9% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
46 matches
#1 Singles
31%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova