← Search

Mary Rudinsky

Lake Oswego, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 50W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Rudinsky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
W
2026-04-25 · SHC-Christensen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Perry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-28 · SHC-Christensen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doug Denney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-13 · SHC-Rudinsky · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Trujillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-07 · SHC-Rudinsky · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Drew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-13 · SHC-Rudinsky · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzie Sarkisian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-02-07 · SHC-Rudinsky · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Sajadi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-17 · SHC-Rudinsky · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Drew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-11-21 · SHC-Razon-Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kerri Patrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-11-02 · SHC-Razon-Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kerri Patrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-10-25 · SHC-Razon-Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monica Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-28 · SHC-Razon-Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kerri Patrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
N/A
2025-06-22 · SHC-Hobi · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kerri Patrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2015–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
80%
24W–6L · 63.1% of games
3.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 42.3% of games
6.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 59.3% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 56.5% of games
6.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 42.1% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer