← Teams

SHC-Razon-Lumetta

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.59 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Michele O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.67
Toni Kidd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Donna Roisom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Babette Zielinski
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Tami Socolofsky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Carmen Warda
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.15
Monica Christensen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Kim Christensen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Melanie DeSilva
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Mary Rudinsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.73
Nancy Heck
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Michele O'Brien
101W–43L career
1%99%0%
3.75
4
Toni Kidd
57W–59L career
3%96%0%
3.67
4
Donna Roisom
100W–85L career
6%94%0%
3.66
3.5
Babette Zielinski
52W–66L career
0%96%4%
3.35
3.5
Tami Socolofsky
31W–36L career
2%92%6%
3.32
3.5
Carmen Warda
68W–35L career
3%97%0%
3.19
3.5
Monica Christensen
27W–36L career
7%93%0%
3.15
3.5
Kim Christensen
41W–43L career
17%82%1%
3.13
3.5
Melanie DeSilva
46W–38L career · type A
12%88%0%
3.11
3.5
Mary Rudinsky
50W–42L career
16%84%0%
3.09
3
Nancy Heck
17W–17L career
6%92%2%
2.73

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.