← Teams

WHRC-Webb

2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Dalika Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Julie Ahn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Mitchell Todd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.93
Cathy Zagunis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
DeWayne Ledbetter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Liz Theeuws
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Manoj Agnihotri
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.76
Santiago Crespo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Dipali Dixit
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2025-05-24Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJulie Ahn / Mitchell Todd vs Michele Snyder / Steve Snyder6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCathy Zagunis / Robert Crawford vs Paula Conway / Jim Fisher3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDipali Dixit / Manoj Agnihotri vs Kathy Ramsey / Christopher Shaw6-3, 6-1
2025-05-23Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesLiz Theeuws / Manoj Agnihotri vs Heike Droste / Tom Grissom6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCathy Zagunis / Santiago Crespo vs Caryn Cohen / Tony Moreno6-1, 6-1
2025-05-17Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesLiz Theeuws / DeWayne Ledbetter vs Michael Jansen / Jennifer Pultz7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Eldridge / Mitchell Todd vs Cathy Cervantez / Robert Hesslink6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCathy Zagunis / Santiago Crespo vs Sarah Robertson / Murray Jansen7-6, 7-5
2025-05-10Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesLiz Theeuws / DeWayne Ledbetter vs Catherine Greenblatt / Michael Jansen7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDipali Dixit / Manoj Agnihotri vs Michelle Johnson / Robert Hesslink6-0, 6-1
2025-04-26Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesCathy Zagunis / Robert Crawford vs Chris van Leeuwen / Paul Garry6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesManoj Agnihotri / Julie Ahn vs Jennifer Trank / Patrick Trank6-1, 6-0
2025-04-13Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDeWayne Ledbetter / Liz Theeuws vs Ramon Tuason / Janet Mills6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Crawford / Cathy Zagunis vs Mitchell Whitehurst / Teresa Darling6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSantiago Crespo / Julie Ahn vs Joselito Navales / Jenny Pizot6-3, 6-1
2025-03-29Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDalika Crawford / Robert Crawford vs James Lawrence / Tonya Halog6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJulie Ahn / Santiago Crespo vs Angie Lee / Zhong Lei6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCathy Zagunis / Mitchell Todd vs Sandi Martes / Dan Iorga6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-15Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesDalika Crawford / Robert Crawford vs Cheryl Roloff / Michael Rich4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Eldridge / Mitchell Todd vs Ellen Bowman / Aaron Bowman6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDipali Dixit / Manoj Agnihotri vs Bonnie Bailey / Jim Mounts3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Dalika Crawford
60W–40L career
0%89%11%
3.45
3.5
Julie Ahn
66W–62L career
7%93%0%
3.13
3
Mitchell Todd
43W–39L career
0%76%24%
3.02
3.5
Cathy Zagunis
45W–66L career
55%45%0%
2.93
3
DeWayne Ledbetter
51W–55L career
2%79%19%
2.92
3
Liz Theeuws
29W–60L career
0%98%2%
2.85
3
Manoj Agnihotri
81W–117L career
0%99%1%
2.83
3
Santiago Crespo
16W–15L career · type S
1%98%1%
2.76
3
Dipali Dixit
40W–48L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.