N OR-WHRC-Reutin

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47

Atom Fjeldsted

usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5

4.21

Catherine Brown

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 25% · published 4.5

4.18

Yuko Hopman

usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4.5

3.97

Nate Look

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4

3.88

Anna Reutin

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.78

Kenya Reutin

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4

3.64

Chizuru Watanabe

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4

3.57

Tommy Trakoolthai

usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4

3.54

Alena Lauritsen

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.43

Jeremy Chiang

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.30

Suzanne Chambers

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5

Atom Fjeldsted

83W–26L career

0%68%32%

4.47

4.5

Catherine Brown

2W–5L career · type S

2%96%3%

4.21

4.5

Yuko Hopman

116W–79L career

0%99%0%

4.18

Nate Look

61W–49L career

0%82%18%

3.97

Anna Reutin

35W–14L career

0%97%3%

3.88

Kenya Reutin

76W–53L career

1%99%1%

3.78

Chizuru Watanabe

64W–48L career

7%93%0%

3.64

Tommy Trakoolthai

76W–58L career

15%85%0%

3.57

3.5

Alena Lauritsen

128W–74L career

0%70%30%

3.54

3.5

Jeremy Chiang

38W–21L career

0%89%11%

3.43

3.5

Suzanne Chambers

80W–68L career

0%98%1%

3.30

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.