Teams

WHRC-Adcock/Watanabe

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Frank Collie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.08
Nathan Austin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.97
Nate Look
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.93
Kevin Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Mckenna Selbak
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Sanh Trinh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Chizuru Watanabe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Masanori Hibino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Daniel Albrecht
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Judi Babcock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Suzanne Chambers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Frank Collie
144W–54L career
0%99%1%
4.24
4.5
Nathan Austin
66W–78L career
5%94%0%
4.08
4
Nate Look
61W–49L career
0%82%18%
3.97
4
Kevin Hughes
102W–52L career
0%91%9%
3.93
4
Mckenna Selbak
23W–18L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Sanh Trinh
56W–37L career
2%98%0%
3.71
4
Chizuru Watanabe
64W–48L career
7%93%0%
3.64
4
Masanori Hibino
17W–24L career
16%83%1%
3.64
4
Daniel Albrecht
30W–29L career
19%81%0%
3.60
3.5
Judi Babcock
128W–57L career
0%82%18%
3.50
3.5
Suzanne Chambers
80W–68L career
0%98%1%
3.30

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.