Search

Paricia Axtell

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
41 matches · 17W–24L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.08
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
16%
down to 3.0
84%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 10% down · 90% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.10. Higher than today’s 3.08 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
289 of 311
WA · 3.5
1257 of 1364

Paricia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Paricia has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2021, 2022, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Paricia has gone from the 20th to the 25th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 43.8% of games
3.5
32.1%
9W–19L · 43.6% of games
7.0
100%
7W–0L · 63.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Lee
0.001about as expected — took 44% of games against 47% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Lee
0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Yogita MANGHNANI / Michelle Weijia Cai
2026-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevyn Hauser
0.002below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Holland
0.033below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Mary Fitzgerald / Megan Slade
2025-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Yee
0.030below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevyn Hauser
+0.014about as expected — took 41% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Holland
0.034below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hanseler
+0.045better than expected — took 65% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Julie Sedlacek / Julia King Hately
2025-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Diane Palmer
+0.009better than expected — took 61% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-12-07 · #3 Doubles · with Mimi Cook
+0.012about as expected — took 35% of games against 35% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Betsy Chamberlin / Renee Sedghinasab
2024-11-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suanty Kaghan
0.014better than expected — took 80% of games against 74% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Jane Sneeringer / TONI BROOKS
2024-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mimi Cook
+0.050better than expected — took 80% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.