Search

Geeta McCormack

Seattle, WA
3.0A year-end 2025
120 matches · 35W–85L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.67
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
201 of 213
WA · 3.0
892 of 960

Geeta is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Geeta has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Geeta has gone from the 2nd to the 33rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
34.2%
13W–25L · 46.4% of games
3.0
30%
15W–35L · 42.3% of games
6.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
26.9%
7W–19L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history120 matches
W
Sarah Utter / Leilani Caldwell
2026-05-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Traverse
+0.052better than expected — took 63% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Adrienne Shanahan / Rives Kitchell
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Murphy
0.030below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Shannon Garbaccio / Alexa Crawford
2026-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Murphy
+0.013better than expected — took 56% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Janet McGuire / Veronica Golden
2026-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pey-Lin Carroll
0.081below expectation — took 8% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Julie Martin / Angela Wang
2026-04-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Murphy
+0.009about as expected — took 38% of games against 37% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Viktoria Ralph / Nerissa Hallberg
2026-02-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Steck
0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Natalia Kuznetsova / Olga McGhee
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniella Kim
+0.008about as expected — took 48% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Pauline Lane / Kimberly Aizawa
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sasha Tanji
+0.057better than expected — took 86% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Leona Zamora / KAYOKO SHIBUE
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Stock
+0.032better than expected — took 59% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-11-07 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natalie Matthews
0.028below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Kim Carey / Christel McArthur
2025-10-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jenny Sanders
+0.067better than expected — took 37% of games against 16% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-09-07 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Ransom
0.026below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.