Search

Margaret Steck

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
94 matches · 27W–67L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.68
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
197 of 213
WA · 3.0
877 of 960

Margaret is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Margaret has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Margaret has gone from the 2nd to the 5th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
33.3%
13W–26L · 46.2% of games
3.0
18.4%
7W–31L · 34.2% of games
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 54.1% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history94 matches
L
Viktoria Ralph / Nerissa Hallberg
2026-02-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Geeta McCormack
0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Karen Rice / Becky Hutt
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Corinne Crabs
0.032below expectation — took 8% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-11-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Suzie Heid
0.009below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-11-07 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catherine Maxson
+0.011about as expected — took 48% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catherine Maxson
+0.070better than expected — took 80% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-10-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natalie Matthews
+0.082better than expected — took 63% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
N/A
2025-08-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annette de Soto
+0.090better than expected — took 100% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Jennifer Howe / Meagan Milca
2025-08-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annette de Soto
0.004below expectation — took 14% of games against 28% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Wendy Feller / Lisa Williamson
2025-08-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annette de Soto
+0.041better than expected — took 53% of games against 38% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Matthews
0.020below expectation — took 8% of games against 30% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Mariano Ortiz Jr / Adawna Windommixed
2025-07-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Gould
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 24% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Erin Bell / Mark Lewinmixed
2025-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Howard Choder
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.