Search

Wendy Feller

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
77 matches · 29W–48L · seasons 20192025
Where Wendy sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Wendy is one of 1468 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 33% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Wendy has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Wendy has gone from the 11th to the 13th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
57.1%
16W–12L · 54% of games
3.0
16.7%
5W–25L · 38.5% of games
6.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 43.9% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history77 matches
L
Lacey Tacher / Stephanie Gribble
2025-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Williamson
0.049below expectation — took 20% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
N/A
2025-08-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Williamson
+0.063better than expected — took 100% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Margaret Steck / Annette de Soto
2025-08-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Williamson
0.041below expectation — took 47% of games against 62% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Williamson
+0.007about as expected — took 44% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Williamson
+0.035about as expected — took 25% of games against 21% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Williamson
0.009below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Williamson
0.007about as expected — took 41% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Angela Bolton / Nina Moorad
2024-11-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alexa Crawford
+0.017better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2024-11-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alexa Crawford
0.013below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2024-11-03 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Erin Bell
0.025below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-11-02 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rebecca Zimmer
0.026below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Mara White / Victor Hsiehmixed
2024-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jay Cho
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.