← Search

Erin Bell

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
78 matches · 25W–53L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.83
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
2%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
151 of 213
WA · 3.0
638 of 960

Erin is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Erin has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Erin has gone from the 2nd to the 24th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
33.3%
14W–28L · 43.1% of games
6.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 43.8% of games
6.0mixed
36.4%
8W–14L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history78 matches
W
Allison Lindsay / Elizabeth Alaniz
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meg Viera
+0.038better than expected — took 68% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 7-6
W
Ann Carlisle / Brooke Small
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather West
+0.022better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Debbie Schrock / Jackie Fuller
2025-10-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alysson Bashey
+0.018about as expected — took 40% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Molly Hilll / Laurie Nelson
2025-10-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristi Edwards
+0.024better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
Angela Bolton / Juliet Wu
2025-10-05 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kris Porter
−0.027below expectation — took 42% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Stacey Kryman / Jillayna Campos
2025-09-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rebecca Zimmer
+0.017better than expected — took 59% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-08-02 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Mcpharlin
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Margaret Steck / Howard Chodermixed
2025-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Lewin
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Jenny Pinkerton / Daniel Ivanismixed
2025-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Lewin
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Sarah Chandler / Barty Nicholson
2025-05-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Zimmer
+0.028better than expected — took 61% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Arden Hofler / Charity Ombao
2025-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Adrian
+0.018better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Aly Baughman
2025-04-19 · #2 Singles · 3.0
−0.002below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.