← Search

Mark LeMaster

Kirkland, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
42 matches · 13W–29L · seasons 2024–2026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.58
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
16%
stay 2.5
84%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 61% stay · 39% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.48. Lower than today’s 2.58 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 2.5
2 of 9
WA · 2.5
73 of 197

Mark is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mark has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 3 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Mark has gone from the 1st to the 2nd percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
2.5
70%
7W–3L · 57.6% of games
3.0
6.7%
1W–14L · 27.1% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.5% of games
3.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 38.9% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 26% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history42 matches
L
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wendy Reynolds
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Frank Taylor
+0.040better than expected — took 56% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marcia Chapman
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Bryan Goode / Ken Wolfe
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Markus Mielke
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-1
W
Ankush Gupta / Harsh Verma
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Markus Mielke
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffrey Merrifield
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-1
L
Doug Wood / Zhan Chen
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryce Danz
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffrey Merrifield
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gregg Watkins
−0.010below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
John Wilmot / Daniel Chua
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Trager
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-01-17 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.014about as expected — took 35% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
N/A
2025-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Craig Ruden
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.