Search

Daniel Chua

Renton, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
96 matches · 40W–56L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.73
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Renton · 3.0
14 of 14
WA · 3.0
832 of 960

Daniel is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Daniel has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Daniel has gone from the 87th to the 8th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
52.5%
31W–28L · 49.2% of games
3.5
8.3%
1W–11L · 26.1% of games
6.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 53.4% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history96 matches
L
Ju Zhao / Jianfeng Zeng
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mohammad Forouzanfar
+0.026about as expected — took 33% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Yangtao Zhang / Xiangjie Li
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt MacArthur
0.018below expectation — took 48% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Michael Gauthier / Brendan Cooke
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aaron Eadson
0.068below expectation — took 0% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
John Busby / Trevor Shibley
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aaron Eadson
+0.029better than expected — took 37% of games against 30% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Raghav Goyal / Simon Swifter
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aaron Eadson
+0.016about as expected — took 33% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Nathan Taggart / Joel Nethery
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Min Joon So
+0.049better than expected — took 53% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Eric Lam / Rahul Mandiga
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Garrett Firestone
0.019below expectation — took 32% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Nik Garkusha / Sunil Tahilramani
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt MacArthur
0.006below expectation — took 20% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Marc Rousso / Greg Rosenwald
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Wilmot
0.005below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Matthew Thomas Allen / Mark Lewin
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Manuel Moises
0.035below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Mark LeMaster / Jeff Trager
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Wilmot
+0.010better than expected — took 63% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
James Bolton / Steven Lockett
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terrance Creighton
+0.010about as expected — took 45% of games against 41% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.