Search

Pamela Olson

Palm Desert, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
105 matches · 65W–40L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.18
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
1%
stay 3.0
99%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 27% stay · 73% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.05. Lower than today’s 3.18 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Pamela has played at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.02.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Pamela has gone from the 44th to the 22nd percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 60.6% of games
2.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 63.3% of games
3.0
72.4%
21W–8L · 59.7% of games
3.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 51.7% of games
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 57.7% of games
7.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 47.4% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history105 matches
L
Davin Womeldorff / Jessica Hawkinsmixed
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jan Claesson
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Jennifer Fuhr / Russ Testamixed
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jan Claesson
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
Amy Gillen / Lisa Hayes
2026-03-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Derheim
+0.013better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
Kimberly Gueltzow / Janie Erickson
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Enstrom
+0.012about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Patricia Baughman / Lorene Peirce
2026-03-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Derheim
0.012below expectation — took 44% of games against 51% expected
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Alice Santos / Karen Bernthal
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Enstrom
0.017below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Kelli Adams / Maurene Cronyn
2026-01-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shelly Enstrom
0.021below expectation — took 61% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
Betsy Blackall / Lynne Prince
2026-01-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Morford
+0.018better than expected — took 53% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Jill Pfeiffer / Connie Weinstein
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Enstrom
0.009below expectation — took 35% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Ingrid Sarapuu / Barb Stoliker
2026-01-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lainie Dickson
0.011below expectation — took 41% of games against 47% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Miranda House / Sirin Sanglimsuwanchamps
2026-01-17 · #2 Doubles · with Lainie Dickson
0.011below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Nancy Pacharzina / Kate Augus
2026-01-07 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julee Moore
+0.070better than expected — took 75% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.