Teams

NWW-FC-Pinkerton

2026 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-08vs CP-ShotSisters-EssingerWon 30
W#1 DoublesDebbie Schrock / Jane Shively vs Nancy Goldberg / Linda Greenlaw7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPenny Jay / Homa Assefi vs Marilyn Pedersen / Leslie Fields6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLori Nelson / Ellen Ramsey vs Lili Chang / Elaine Loong6-1, 6-3
2026-06-04vs BETC-HughesLost 12
L#1 DoublesPenny Jay / Debbie Schrock vs Sally Linebarger / MaryAnn O'Connell4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKristen Stead / Jude Neldam vs Jill Wakefield / Pamela Menchaca7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLori Nelson / Jenny Pinkerton vs Nona Allison / Lila Hughes7-5, 7-6
2026-05-29vs BC-WalkerWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarrie Wies / Lori Nelson vs Ann Lampman / Betsy Chamberlin6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSherrill Stone / Jenny Pinkerton vs Anne Bratton / Elizabeth Leider7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJude Neldam / Kristen Stead vs Bonnie Currey / Diane Kuenster6-1, 6-1
2026-05-22vs NWW-NTC-TuckerWon 30
W#1 DoublesPenny Jay / Debbie Schrock vs Rosemary Curran / Donna Lou6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarrie Wies / Edith Matulka vs Valerie Gilbert / Alison Aleinikoff6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnn Rae Smith / Lori Nelson vs Kathy Trumbauer / Ann Bowden6-1, 6-1
2026-05-15vs BETC-Ikeda 6.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarrie Wies / Edith Matulka vs Julie Ikeda / Sue Bonner6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLori Nelson / Ann Rae Smith vs Ruthann Nelson / Linda Blegen6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPenny Jay / Debbie Schrock vs MARILYN PORTER / Amy Morse6-3, 6-3
2026-05-06vs RBW-Howe NiceWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnn Rae Smith / Lori Nelson vs Pam Rasanen / Maren Gibson6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPenny Jay / Edith Matulka vs Roseshel Howe / Stacey Roehrs6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDebbie Schrock / Jane Shively vs Debra Simmonds / Nikki Juhlin6-0, 6-2
2026-04-28vs HBSQ-YeighWon 21
L#1 DoublesJane Shively / Debbie Schrock vs Diane Lee / Jane O'Brien3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLori Nelson / Ann Rae Smith vs Mary Mcevoy / Michell Marx6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKristen Stead / Jude Neldam vs Laurie Nelson / Molly Jenkins6-1, 6-1
2026-04-17vs HBSQ-TierneyLost 12
W#1 DoublesPenny Jay / Edith Matulka vs Mary Heller / Carol Rea4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Rae Smith / Jude Neldam vs Colleen Tracy / Joyce Tierney6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLori Nelson / Sherrill Stone vs Darla Schlumberger / Yumi Roberts6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Carrie Wies
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
3.07
Ann Rae Smith
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.02
Jude Neldam
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.98
Edith Matulka
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.98
Lori Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.94
Penny Jay
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Debbie Schrock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Kristen Stead
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Homa Assefi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Jane Shively
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Sherrill Stone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Jenny Pinkerton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Ellen Ramsey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Penny Jay + Homa Assefi16264% games+8.8% vs expected
Debbie Schrock + Homa Assefi4160% games+6.5% vs expected
Lori Nelson + Jenny Pinkerton201254% games+3.8% vs expected
Jane Shively + Debbie Schrock291455% games+3.3% vs expected
Jenny Pinkerton + Kristen Stead2445% games+0.1% vs expected
Lori Nelson + Debbie Schrock8455% games−0.9% vs expected
Carrie Wies + Jenny Pinkerton4352% games−1.7% vs expected
Lori Nelson + Jane Shively4353% games−2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carrie Wies
38W–39L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.09
3
Ann Rae Smith
51W–84L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Jude Neldam
66W–59L career · type A · 7 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.02
3
Edith Matulka
63W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Lori Nelson
80W–63L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Penny Jay
138W–65L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Debbie Schrock
131W–115L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Kristen Stead
71W–63L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Homa Assefi
57W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Jane Shively
86W–76L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Sherrill Stone
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Jenny Pinkerton
86W–113L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
Ellen Ramsey
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.