Teams

CP-Mixed Shots-Marquart

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.56 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-21vs WSC-KrammerWon 30
W#1 DoublesGlenn Chinn / Tracy Brodahl vs Steve Stetter / Khue Tran3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJustin Marquart / Priyanka Joshi vs Kenn Wildes / Elena Ivanova6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJoseph Allison / Tina Chinn vs Kelly Buck / Paul Bifford6-3, 6-3
2025-11-15vs AYTC-Lobsters-SunWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoe van Zyl / Tina Chinn vs Andrew Post / Connie Sun6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLuke Burtis / Margot Linde vs Melissa Tran / Logan Ainsworth6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesWill Wang / Priyanka Joshi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-11-08vs AYTC-Spin and Tonic-SiegWon 21
W#1 DoublesPriyanka Joshi / Kamal Elkhadiri vs Lori Beehner / Henry Kiner7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMargot Linde / Jayden Chen vs Kim Li Eng / John Toutonghi6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKatie van Zyl / Glenn Chinn vs Nari Benson / Jason Herrera4-6, 1-6
2025-11-02vs BETC-Topspinners-LucenaWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoe van Zyl / Elisabeth Newkirk vs Matt Topping / Anne Salvino6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLuke Burtis / Mindy Marquart vs Jan Teves / Katrina Lau3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGreg Harriman / Katie van Zyl vs Ahlay Phylavong / Andrea Noon6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-25vs PSC-Fun-2026-7.0-Mix-ZhouWon 21
W#1 DoublesGreg Harriman / Tracy Brodahl vs Bogdan Moldoveanu / Celia Zhu3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKamal Elkhadiri / Emily Christensen vs Cheng Zhang / Lynn Dai6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesWill Wang / Joanna Bengford vs Heidi Richter / Yuan Wang2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJustin Marquart / Elisabeth Newkirk vs Elaine Hoy / Peilun Shan4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLuke Burtis / Joanna Bengford vs Lina Nguyen / William Snedegar7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKamal Elkhadiri / Emily Christensen vs David Lam / Rachel Wallach3-6, 4-6
2025-10-04vs EDG-DoubleEdgers-HuangWon 30
W#1 DoublesJustin Marquart / Elisabeth Newkirk vs Bing Li / Tomomi Gao6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMindy Marquart / Jayden Chen vs Jack Young / Brook Koski6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoe van Zyl / Tina Chinn vs Qi Geng / Chun-Liang Lin6-0, 6-0
2025-09-20vs TCSP-Lob and Order-GatchecoWon 30
W#1 DoublesGreg Harriman / Katie van Zyl vs Chris Morse / Erica Lerer6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoseph Allison / Elisabeth Newkirk vs Vaidy Krishnan / Aki Tameling6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGlenn Chinn / Tracy Brodahl vs Scott Houghtaling / Catherine Maxson6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Greg Harriman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Glenn Chinn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Margot Linde
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
Mindy Marquart
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.68
Joanna Bengford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Joe van Zyl
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.36
Emily Christensen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Kamal Elkhadiri
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.35
Justin Marquart
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Tina Chinn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Elisabeth Newkirk
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Priyanka Joshi
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Luke Burtis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Joseph Allison
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.95
Jayden Chen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.92
Tracy Brodahl
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Katie van Zyl
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Will Wang
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joe van Zyl + Katie van Zyl21267% games+24.0% vs expected
Greg Harriman + Elisabeth Newkirk10457% games+13.6% vs expected
Glenn Chinn + Tina Chinn6259% games+8.9% vs expected
Greg Harriman + Mindy Marquart7158% games+8.9% vs expected
Mindy Marquart + Justin Marquart13955% games+2.9% vs expected
Glenn Chinn + Tracy Brodahl6160% games+1.6% vs expected
Kamal Elkhadiri + Joanna Bengford71243% games−2.4% vs expected
Tina Chinn + Kamal Elkhadiri0540% games−5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Greg Harriman
135W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Glenn Chinn
92W–58L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Margot Linde
58W–12L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Mindy Marquart
111W–73L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.73
4
Joanna Bengford
95W–81L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Joe van Zyl
102W–41L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Emily Christensen
95W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Kamal Elkhadiri
79W–93L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Justin Marquart
108W–84L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Tina Chinn
101W–51L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Elisabeth Newkirk
126W–64L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Priyanka Joshi
81W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Luke Burtis
32W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Joseph Allison
83W–94L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Jayden Chen
15W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Tracy Brodahl
79W–46L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Katie van Zyl
85W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Will Wang
37W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.