Teams

Anna Ruffini

2022 Winter Singles Flex League (YER) · 3.5 Women

1 player · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-30vs JakotichWon 10
W#1 SinglesAnna Ruffini vs Erin Jakotich6-4, 6-2
2022-06-22vs JLWon 10
W#1 SinglesAnna Ruffini vs Jessmin Lau7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2022-05-23vs GardnerLost 01
L#1 SinglesAnna Ruffini vs Jennifer Gardner6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-04-12vs Lim - FlexibleLost 01
L#1 SinglesAnna Ruffini vs Genevieve Lim2-6, 1-6
2022-03-30vs GerardWon 10
W#1 SinglesAnna Ruffini vs Melanie Gerard6-2, 6-2
2022-02-23vs Noeun - Weeknights/WeekendsWon 10
W#1 SinglesAnna Ruffini vs Rene Noeun6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings70 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1brookeg6060017
2Lim - Flexible6060024
3cowden-templeton weekends6060233
4Hill - flexible5050110
5Graves (daytime only)5050115
6JOBIWA- flexible5050130
7Graham5050225
8Lambert - Weekends5151235
9Team Jake5151330
10Buckingham Daytime5151436
11Gardner5151440
12Haag-daytime5151539
13TennisHappy!4141223
14AMitchell DAYTIME4141340
15Daniels (daytime)4141334
16Cankaya (Daytime Only)4141340
17Yang4242223
18Jay (flexible)4242330
19T HOM4242328
20Rasmussen (daytime only)4242433
21Callaghan4242551
22Anna Ruffini4242554
23Chechitelli3131322
24focaccia3131439
25Preciado Flexible3232324
26Rana M /Weekend3232432
27Janson (daytime)3232537
28Pepper3232546
29Jakotich3333544
30SUN3333640
31Kvong3333753
32Lee2222428
33Campbell - daytime2323437
34Torrealba2323546
35Donnelly (daytime)2323542
36Tykeela (daytime)2323542
37AZ2323646
38Taniguchi (daytime)2323649
39Schonhoff (daytime)2323638
40BB-8 (daytime only)2323645
41J Kalman2323648
42Mini (daytime)2323754
43Watts2323852
44Eng Weekend/Evenings2424751
45Wang Daytime2424750
46Noeun - Weeknights/Weekends2424759
47Mosebar (Weekend/Weeknight)2424857
48Tramster2424860
49JCM2424852
50SJohnson2424864
51Lesley Ekue2424958
52Bast-Weekends2424960
53Bloch1313636
54Walton (Weeknights/weekends)1414848
55The art of single/flexible1414955
56Gerard1515967
57Shams15151059
58HS Marquart15151064
59FREEB - DAYTIME15151059
60Lai (flexible)15151059
61Malanowski- wknds15151061
62Kirkpatrick 3.50404846
63KacinoRoyale0505958
64Stephenson - mornings or weekends. no weeknights.05051060
65Vail- weekday05051056
66VOLD-Daytime Only05051063
67Robertson05051058
68JL06061274
69Amely Wurmbrand06061272
70Vu (flexible)06061272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Ruffini
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anna Ruffini
77W–53L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.