Search

Liliia Ozerska

Woodinville, WA
4.0C year-end 2023
69 matches · 48W–21L · seasons 20192023
Where Liliia sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Liliia is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Liliia has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02019202020222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Liliia has gone from the 55th to the 98th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
76.9%
20W–6L · 57.9% of games
4.0
60%
6W–4L · 52.6% of games
7.0mixed
76.5%
13W–4L · 56.8% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history69 matches
L
Suzanne Eichenlaub / Kim de Booij - Moorschamps
2023-06-18 · #1 Doubles · with Danxia Chen
0.010below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-06-17 · #2 Doubles · with Danxia Chen
+0.008about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2023-06-10 · #3 Doubles · with Danxia Chen
0.032below expectation — took 50% of games against 63% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Olano
+0.018better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2023-05-12 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.078better than expected — took 71% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2023-05-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Olano
+0.023better than expected — took 41% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-04-28 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.033below expectation — took 55% of games against 66% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-04-21 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.013about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2023-04-07 · #2 Singles · 4.0
0.007better than expected — took 100% of games against 86% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2022-12-09 · #2 Doubles · with Timur Sadykov
0.016below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2022-12-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timur Sadykov
+0.000below expectation — took 63% of games against 70% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2022-11-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timur Sadykov
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.