← Search

Julia Hartvigson

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 96W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julia Hartvigson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history148 matches
W
2026-06-05 · TCSP-Anderson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirstin Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-30 · TCSP-Anderson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-24 · TCSP-Anderson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan Maguire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-17 · TCSP-Anderson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Blum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-03 · TCSP-Anderson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Shewey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-27 · TCSP-Anderson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Bratrud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-28 · NTC-Shake and Bake-Blum · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Hathaway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-22 · NTC-Shake and Bake-Blum · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-01-18 · NTC-Shake and Bake-Blum · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirstin Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-01-09 · NTC-Shake and Bake-Blum · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirstin Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-01-02 · NTC-Shake and Bake-Blum · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-21 · See Ya! · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Hathaway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 68.1% of games
4.0
55.4%
41W–33L · 52.7% of games
7.0mixed
94.1%
16W–1L · 68.6% of games
8.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 54.2% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
20 matches
#1 Singles
9%
13 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova