Search

Leslie Bratrud

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
33 matches · 19W–14L · seasons 20192026
Where Leslie sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Leslie is one of 1052 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Leslie has been 4.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.54.02019202020212022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Leslie has gone from the 42nd to the 39th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
62.5%
15W–9L · 53.5% of games
4.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history33 matches
W
2026-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Hartvigson
+0.021better than expected — took 63% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janie DiMartino
+0.015better than expected — took 46% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Meldahl
0.010below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Stephanie Page / Kerrie Houston Reightley
2025-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Hsu
+0.026better than expected — took 80% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Hathaway
0.012about as expected — took 46% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deven McCoy
0.008about as expected — took 43% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Graff
0.036below expectation — took 47% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2023-05-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janie DiMartino
0.039below expectation — took 65% of games against 74% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2023-05-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deven McCoy
0.006about as expected — took 68% of games against 65% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Gina Jaffe
2023-05-05 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.041better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2023-03-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janie DiMartino
0.045below expectation — took 20% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2023-02-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Addicott
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.