Search

Maggie Xu

Redmond, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
97 matches · 64W–33L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.57
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
18%
down to 3.5
82%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 11% down · 89% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.60. Higher than today’s 3.57 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Redmond · 4.0
15 of 20
WA · 4.0
604 of 782

Maggie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Maggie has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Maggie has gone from the 72nd to the 88th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
79.5%
31W–8L · 61.4% of games
4.0
50%
11W–11L · 48.4% of games
8.0
50%
3W–3L · 48.2% of games
7.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 64.4% of games
8.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 37.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history97 matches
W
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather McKay
+0.012about as expected — took 52% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Celia Evans / Catherine Davidson
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nadine Ramstead
+0.056better than expected — took 86% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-10-18 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Beth Hom
0.030below expectation — took 37% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-09-27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leigh Ann More
0.020below expectation — took 41% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-09-21 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Long
0.022below expectation — took 35% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-09-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Beth Hom
+0.001better than expected — took 80% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanna Bengford
0.002about as expected — took 47% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mila Niset
+0.075better than expected — took 80% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Youngmee Kim
+0.080better than expected — took 92% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-02-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Colter
0.015about as expected — took 55% of games against 58% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2024-11-03 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Beth Hom
+0.036better than expected — took 58% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-09-06 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Aagard
+0.025better than expected — took 45% of games against 39% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.