Teams

CP-Garnett

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Priscilla McAughan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.88
Kirsten Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.86
Michele Ferreira
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Results5 ties
2024-11-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Garnett / Michele Ferreira vs Emiko Way / Kyoko Imai7-5, 6-4
2024-11-03Won 20
W#1 DoublesTERRIE LUQUETTE / Priscilla McAughan vs Laurie Garay / Waka Kitabayashi7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLeigh Ann More / Michele Ferreira vs Kay Almer / Cynthia Retter-Hastings6-3, 6-3
2024-10-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesKirsten Barnes / Karin Fusetti vs Katie Jergens / Mary Ogborn6-3, 6-3
2024-09-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesKarin Fusetti / Kirsten Barnes vs Adrienne Crowley / Susanne Neupauer6-2, 6-0
2024-09-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPriscilla McAughan / Leigh Ann More vs Susan Kushibuchi / Racquel Johnson6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Priscilla McAughan
60W–85L career
31%69%0%
3.93
4.5
Kirsten Barnes
54W–41L career
45%55%0%
3.88
4.5
Michele Ferreira
46W–79L career
51%49%0%
3.86

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.