Search

Michael Hull

Redmond, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
96 matches · 58W–38L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.35
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
97%
stay 3.5
3%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.31. Lower than today’s 3.35 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Redmond · 3.5
20 of 43
WA · 3.5
411 of 1209

Michael is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michael has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Michael has gone from the 92nd to the 59th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
65.2%
30W–16L · 56.8% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 37.2% of games
7.0
88.2%
15W–2L · 57.7% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history96 matches
W
Matthew Levering / Alexander Moshchuk
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Neal
+0.004about as expected — took 52% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Blake Anderson / Scott Lennard
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Grobstok
+0.013better than expected — took 60% of games against 51% expected
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Tim Ho / Archimedes Orbino
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Lynch
+0.018better than expected — took 62% of games against 53% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
SANCHIT AGARWAL / Sudhir Raman
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Neal
0.021about as expected — took 62% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Zane Dundon / Cameron Renteria
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Neal
0.042below expectation — took 35% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Steven Luong / Alex Tan
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Oliver Graves
+0.020better than expected — took 56% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
JON COOMBES / Jay Lee
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe van Zyl
0.034below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Mark Villiott / Tipu Qureshi
2026-03-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Skilton
0.049below expectation — took 25% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Amit Wadhwa / Sunil Tahilramani
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Neal
+0.032better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Neal
+0.002about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
Joshua Batchelder / Scott Hudson
2026-01-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Morrow
+0.036better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-12-06 · #3 Doubles · with Craig Neal
+0.052better than expected — took 75% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.