Search

Craig Neal

Yarrow Point, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
84 matches · 47W–37L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.28
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Yarrow Point · 3.5
4 of 5
WA · 3.5
668 of 1364

Craig is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Craig has been a steady 3.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Craig has gone from the 91st to the 53rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
65.9%
27W–14L · 58.2% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 34.7% of games
7.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 54.9% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leah Gray
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Matthew Levering / Alexander Moshchuk
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Hull
+0.002about as expected — took 52% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
SANCHIT AGARWAL / Sudhir Raman
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Hull
0.020about as expected — took 62% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Zane Dundon / Cameron Renteria
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Hull
0.042below expectation — took 35% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Gabriel Perez / Roy Higashi
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Morrow
0.030below expectation — took 41% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Amit Wadhwa / Sunil Tahilramani
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Hull
+0.033better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Morrow
0.010about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Hull
+0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-06 · #3 Doubles · with Michael Hull
+0.053better than expected — took 75% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Pope
0.003about as expected — took 55% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Hull
0.014below expectation — took 41% of games against 50% expected
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Lund
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.