← Teams

CP-Just For Giggles Mixed 8.0-James

2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0

3 players · average NTRP 4.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Kirsten Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.86
Michele Ferreira
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.54
Kimberly Skorupa
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
Results5 ties
2025-08-10Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesTim Mcroberts / Kimberly Skorupa vs Erin Shigaki / Barry Strand6-2, 6-3
2025-07-26Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesXiadong Gong / Kimberly Skorupa vs Sara Addicott / Tom Parrish6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-07-19Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesKimberly Skorupa / Steve Oroszlan vs Kay Almer / Eric Loh7-5, 6-4
2025-07-06Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesKirsten Barnes / Craig Neal vs Mick Horton / Helen Omand6-4, 6-4
2025-06-29Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesKimberly Skorupa / Xiadong Gong vs Janine VanderWhitte / Ra'Id Khalil6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichele Ferreira / Richard Clark vs Ge Li / David McGrady6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Kirsten Barnes
54W–41L career
45%55%0%
3.88
4.5
Michele Ferreira
46W–79L career
51%49%0%
3.86
4
Kimberly Skorupa
132W–138L career
21%80%0%
3.54

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.