← Search

Daniel Manning

Renton, WA
3.5C year-end 2023
46 matches · 18W–28L · seasons 2019–2024
Where Daniel sits
73
2.5
775
3.0
1278
3.5
930
4.0
419
4.5
77
5.0

Daniel is one of 1278 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3552. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 60% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Daniel has been a steady 3.5 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Daniel has gone from the 7th to the 69th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
44.1%
15W–19L · 47.3% of games
4.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history46 matches
L
2024-02-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barry Strand
−0.007about as expected — took 47% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2024-02-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David To
+0.011better than expected — took 100% of games against 79% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-01-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Dickson
−0.033below expectation — took 37% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2023-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barry Strand
+0.056better than expected — took 56% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Loh
+0.001about as expected — took 35% of games against 38% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
2023-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Howard
−0.024about as expected — took 68% of games against 71% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Allan Johnson / William Hall
2023-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wayne Hwang
−0.030below expectation — took 0% of games against 28% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rajive Kilambi
+0.039better than expected — took 29% of games against 22% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
N/A
2023-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Schelley
−0.012better than expected — took 100% of games against 88% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2023-04-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Lee
−0.040below expectation — took 48% of games against 64% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2023-03-25 · #3 Doubles · with Brian Dickson
−0.032below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Peter Stroble / Rafe Quinn
2023-03-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raymond Hsia
−0.013below expectation — took 38% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.