← Search

Stuart Cobb

Woodinville, WA
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
40 matches · 18W–22L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stuart Cobb to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
L
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · with Alvin Sato championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · with Frank Hammer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-04 · NWW-MC-Sato · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Hammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-21 · NWW-MC-Sato · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Sefton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-14 · NWW-MC-Sato · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Hammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-08 · NWW-MC-Sato · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alvin Sato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-01 · NWW-MC-Sato · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Weathers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-10-04 · WSC-Carlson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-28 · WSC-Carlson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with JOHN GLOVER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-21 · WSC-Carlson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Sefton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-06 · WSC-Carlson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with JOHN GLOVER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2024-10-20 · WSC-Carlson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with JOHN GLOVER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.6% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 59.8% of games
8.0
40.7%
11W–16L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams