← Search

Scott Chapman

Shoreline, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 65W–75L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Scott Chapman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
W
2026-06-01 · HBSQ-Deuce Nukem-Yu · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sam Konswa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-10 · HBSQ-Deuce Nukem-Yu · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Marcus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · HBSQ-The Hammers-Aizawa · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Villiott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-02-21 · HBSQ-The Hammers-Aizawa · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-07 · HBSQ-The Hammers-Aizawa · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Lynagh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-10-25 · HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Duane Hauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-09-27 · HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Sampson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-19 · HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gordon Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-07-19 · HBSQ-Garfield/Rea · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathryn Sherman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-06-13 · HBSQ-Garfield/Rea · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathryn Sherman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-05-24 · HBSQ-Deuce Nukem-Yu · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Marcus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-12 · HBSQ-Deuce Nukem-Yu · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Lynagh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
48.4%
30W–32L · 50.7% of games
4.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.8% of games
7.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 56.6% of games
8.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 45.5% of games
7.0mixed
45%
9W–11L · 52.7% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
40 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal