← Search

Anup Agarwal

Mill Creek, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 35W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anup Agarwal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-05-22 · CAC/SL-Phoenix-Gajjar · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roshan Picardo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-05-02 · CAC/SL-Phoenix-Gajjar · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-19 · CAC/SL-Phoenix-Gajjar · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kapil Pruthi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-03-08 · NWW-CAC/SL-Gajjar · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Kim-Himmelfarb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-02-21 · NWW-CAC/SL-Gajjar · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roshan Picardo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-05-31 · CAC/SL-Phoenix-Pruthi · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony Prangley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-05-18 · CAC/SL-Phoenix-Pruthi · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony Prangley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-04-13 · CAC/SL-Phoenix-Pruthi · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashish Goel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2025-04-06 · CAC/SL-Phoenix-Pruthi · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jag Singh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2025-03-08 · CAC/SL-Phoenix-Agrawal · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kalpesh Bhimani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-01-04 · CAC/SL-Phoenix-Agrawal · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kapil Pruthi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2024-11-17 · CAC/SL-Fahey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Carey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
54.3%
19W–16L · 54.5% of games
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 42.3% of games
7.0mixed
52.2%
12W–11L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
29 matches
#1 Singles
21%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
11 matches
#2 Singles
14%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe