Search

Nathan Linden

Renton, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
62 matches · 37W–25L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.56
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
24%
stay 3.5
76%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 69% stay · 31% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.46. Lower than today’s 3.56 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Renton · 3.5
1 of 17
WA · 3.5
44 of 1460

Nathan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Nathan has been 3.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.52019202020212022202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Nathan has gone from the 75th to the 99th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
64.6%
31W–17L · 57.2% of games
7.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history62 matches
W
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · with Dennis van Doorn
+0.035better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dennis van Doorn
+0.035better than expected — took 86% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Sangho Yeo / Vaibhav Bora
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dennis van Doorn
+0.044better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Anup Agarwal / Roshan Picardo
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dennis van Doorn
0.012below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Matt Topping / Chris Tom
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dennis van Doorn
0.020below expectation — took 45% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
Tunde Adams / Tyler Le
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dennis van Doorn
+0.016better than expected — took 92% of games against 72% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Jon Lynch / Jay Patel
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dennis van Doorn
+0.043better than expected — took 92% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Frank Taylor / Eric Baird - *
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dennis van Doorn
+0.020better than expected — took 80% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Ethan Chung / Jason Preston
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dennis van Doorn
+0.015better than expected — took 65% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-11-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caitlin Baker
+0.000about as expected — took 43% of games against 45% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caitlin Baker
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caitlin Baker
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 50% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.