Search

Stacy Mathers

Kirkland, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
54 matches · 39W–15L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.79
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 3.0
34 of 49
WA · 3.0
715 of 960

Stacy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Stacy has been a steady 3.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021, 2025, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Stacy has gone from the 88th to the 35th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
77.3%
34W–10L · 57.9% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history54 matches
W
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Nelson
+0.003better than expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Kuniko Jacobson / Vineet Tiwari
2026-04-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Leahy
+0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Elise Zabel / Nikki Juhlin
2026-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Louise Farrell
0.014below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ana Reyes
0.014about as expected — took 71% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Rebecca DeGeorge / Rebecca Buxbaum
2025-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Bratton
0.036below expectation — took 44% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
Rhonda Sinwell / Wai Man Cheng
2025-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Bratton
+0.015better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Margaret Steck / Maika D'ambrosi
2025-04-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pia Jacobsen
+0.013better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Dan Sun / Lacey Bliss
2024-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joy Page
+0.051better than expected — took 75% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2024-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Wehrle
0.037below expectation — took 38% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2024-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Myhrvold
0.033below expectation — took 54% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2024-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Leahy
+0.001about as expected — took 35% of games against 38% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Amy Franck / Veronica Golden
2024-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Mohanty
0.028below expectation — took 48% of games against 58% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.