Search

Rebecca Buxbaum

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
45 matches · 14W–31L · seasons 20212026
Where Rebecca sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Rebecca is one of 1468 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 33% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rebecca has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Rebecca has gone from the 11th to the 9th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 62.4% of games
3.0
21.9%
7W–25L · 37.7% of games
6.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history45 matches
L
2025-09-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Sung
0.038below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Sallie Ragsdale / Teresa Engrav
2025-09-07 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Lalime
+0.032better than expected — took 60% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cristi Rivas
+0.002about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Heather Lorge / Tanya Vail
2025-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debara Ferleman
0.025below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cristi Rivas
+0.039better than expected — took 25% of games against 19% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Schultze
+0.029better than expected — took 45% of games against 35% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca DeGeorge
+0.045better than expected — took 56% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
Sally Witt / Dayna Wurster
2025-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laurie Wilkins
0.053below expectation — took 14% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Debbie Lo / Dana Feder
2025-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ruth Chan
0.063below expectation — took 8% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Geeta McCormack / Mary Ransom
2025-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Lalime
+0.035better than expected — took 65% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-04-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Lalime
0.004about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Erin McMonigal / Nina Moorad
2025-02-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ruth Chan
+0.028better than expected — took 48% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-7
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.