← Search

Anne Richardson-Lander

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 64W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anne Richardson-Lander to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
W
2026-06-04 · RBW-Group Therapy-English · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Raffetto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-13 · RBW-Group Therapy-English · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Lalime
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-22 · RBW-Group Therapy-English · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aasa Holmgren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-21 · RBW-Group Therapy-English · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Lalime
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-15 · RBW-Group Therapy-English · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Raffetto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-2
W
2026-01-24 · RBW-Group Therapy-English · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Sung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-07-05 · ETC-Holmgren · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Relyea mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-06-21 · ETC-Holmgren · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Relyea mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-02-23 · RBW-Group Therapy-English · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-02-09 · RBW-Group Therapy-English · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aasa Holmgren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-11-16 · RBW-Holmgren · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Relyea mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-10-06 · RBW-Holmgren · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eddy Ferre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.4% of games
3.0
69.6%
39W–17L · 57.6% of games
3.5
25%
3W–9L · 41.3% of games
6.0mixed
81%
17W–4L · 59.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 30% of the time
#1 Singles
30%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
21 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova