← Search

Pia Jacobsen

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 45W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Pia Jacobsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
W
2026-06-26 · BC-Rice · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Vikki Littleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
N/A
2025-05-21 · NWW-BC-Rice · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-04-29 · BC-Bloch · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jen Waldher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-04-08 · BC-Bloch · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cara Perla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-04-01 · BC-Bloch · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacy Mathers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2024-10-11 · BC-Leahy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-09-08 · BC-Leahy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-06-10 · BC-Rice · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Coakley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-06 · NTC-Tucker · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Geballe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2024-06-05 · BC-Rice · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
Jane Price / Barbara Murakami
2024-05-10 · NTC-Tucker · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Geballe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-05-03 · BC-Bloch · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Leahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
40.4%
19W–28L · 46.6% of games
6.0
51.7%
15W–14L · 53% of games
7.0
40%
6W–9L · 45.1% of games
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
25 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer