← Search

Linda Fletcher

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Freeland, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 38W–26L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history64 matches
L
2025-05-14 · NWW-MI-Govier · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Regan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-07 · NWW-MI-Govier · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Regan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-04-16 · NWW-MI-Govier · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Govier
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-1
L
2024-09-21 · HBSQ-Let's Go!!! Korch · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cheryl Pleas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
W
2024-06-10 · NWW-HBSQ-Cho · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Tracy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-06-05 · NWW-HBSQ-Cho · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Tracy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-05-13 · NWW-HBSQ-Cho · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darla Schlumberger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-05-06 · NWW-HBSQ-Cho · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joyce Tierney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-05-02 · NWW-HBSQ-Cho · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Tracy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-04-25 · NWW-HBSQ-Cho · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Tracy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-04-16 · NWW-HBSQ-Cho · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Tracy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-02-28 · PHX/AbrahamSpeller/65&O/8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marie Welsh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 46.4% of games
7.0
82.6%
19W–4L · 60.5% of games
8.0
50%
12W–12L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 53% of the time
#2 Doubles
53%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer