Teams

CAC/SL-Lang/Morrow

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-18vs BC-Taylor/ScherWon 32
W#1 DoublesSusan Kushibuchi / Margaret Zheng vs Allyson Marks / Katrina Fleming6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLily Enquist vs Kate Scher2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Morrow / Jill Lang vs Sonya Tobeck / Leslie Bernstein6-2, 5-5
W#2 SinglesAngie Nawalany vs Marilyn Johnson6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKatie Stark / Kim Weyer vs Claudia Hung / Tobey Bryant1-6, 3-6
2021-06-11vs BC-Taylor/ScherWon 41
W#1 DoublesSusan Kushibuchi / Margaret Zheng vs Allyson Marks / Stacy King6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAngie Nawalany vs Julie Huard6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHeather Morrow / Jill Lang vs Claudia Hung / Leslie Bernstein6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLily Enquist vs Angela Taylor6-3, 3-4
L#3 DoublesMichele Soelling / Akari Fried vs Tobey Bryant / Carla Iafrate6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2021-06-04vs WSC-Nets Win! PapikWon 32
W#1 DoublesHeather Morrow / Margaret Zheng vs Patricia Houghton / Gina Rogers6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAngie Nawalany vs Julie Meyer6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Kushibuchi / Akari Fried vs Kami Shaw / Anne Papik6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLily Enquist vs Mary Wiegenstein1-6, 6-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Fletcher / Michele Soelling vs Mariko Kimura / Emiko Way6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesSusan Kushibuchi / Margaret Zheng vs Anna Duff / Kimberly Stein3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKim Weyer vs Carol Lelivelt2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Morrow / Katie Stark vs Mistie Iseman / Marina Abbott2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLily Enquist vs Laura Laun6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLaurie Hofmann / Jill Lang vs Holly Yang / Donna Massoth6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-21vs RBW-MurphyWon 41
W#1 DoublesSusan Kushibuchi / Margaret Zheng vs Edna Gossage / Claire Pirie6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAngie Nawalany vs Kirsten Fatland6-7, 3-3
W#2 DoublesHeather Morrow / Katie Stark vs Sunita Iyer / Kristi Nicholson6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLily Enquist vs Anne Wilson6-1, 4-4
W#3 DoublesVictoria van Zile / Michele Soelling vs Jenny Dire / Stormi Danis6-0, 6-0
2021-05-07vs RBW-MurphyWon 32
W#1 DoublesJill Lang / Margaret Zheng vs Jenny Dire / Stormi Danis6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAngie Nawalany vs Sabina Hilmar2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Morrow / Katie Stark vs Sunita Iyer / Kristi Nicholson6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLily Enquist vs Anne Wilson3-6, 5-1
L#3 DoublesLaurie Hofmann / Linda Fletcher vs Suzanne Eichenlaub / Edna Gossage2-6, 2-6
2021-04-30vs MI-GregoryWon 50
W#1 DoublesKatie Stark / Kim Weyer vs Stephanie Kornblum / Erin Gurney6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAngie Nawalany vs Kathryn Hagstrom7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJill Lang / Margaret Zheng vs Nancy Leung / Carol Gregory7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLily Enquist vs Emily Peyser6-2, 5-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Kushibuchi / Akari Fried vs Kathy Govier / Suzy Skone6-2, 6-1
2021-04-22vs TCSP-McCoyWon 32
W#1 DoublesHeather Morrow / Jill Lang vs Janie DiMartino / Karen Schmid6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesMargaret Zheng vs Diana Nickel6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaurie Hofmann / Katie Stark vs Lisa Mckenny / Lori Moriarty7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLily Enquist vs Christina Jones6-3, 3-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Kushibuchi / Akari Fried vs Kim Taylor / Angie Aggen6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MI-Hartmann71281227274
2CAC/SL-Lang/Morrow71271331298
3CP-Causin a Racquet during the day! Laun71261435329
4TCSP-Mini6129614174
5AYTC-BTS Army-Nguyen52231227263
6EDG-Mama Mia! Kainz52211433298
7AYTC (OUTDOORS) Miller43152043328
8AYTC-Hunter43161945345
9RBW-Be The Light-Recchi44241634327
10WSC-Nets Win! Papik44211948357
11MI-Gregory44162456396
12AYTC-Smash Hits-Vecchio34152046327
13CP-Boot & Rally-Hansen34152049345
14TCSP-Beat!Play!Love! Knoll35142651364
15BAIN-Reightley25132245331
16BETC-Play It forward-Shaheen25132248341
17TCSP-Acarregui26152552380
18FC-Sweet Shots-Llacuna16152044336
19RBW-Murphy17142652403
20MC-Downright Smashing-French0792654356

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Heather Morrow
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.92
Angie Nawalany
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.82
Margaret Zheng
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Jill Lang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Akari Fried
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Katie Stark
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
Victoria van Zile
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Lily Enquist
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
3.71
Kim Weyer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.70
Laurie Hofmann
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Susan Kushibuchi
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.22
Michele Soelling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Linda Fletcher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Weyer + Akari Fried6063% games+15.5% vs expected
Kim Weyer + Katie Stark3552% games+12.7% vs expected
Katie Stark + Akari Fried5166% games+9.8% vs expected
Jill Lang + Heather Morrow12361% games+7.4% vs expected
Susan Kushibuchi + Margaret Zheng5262% games+5.2% vs expected
Jill Lang + Akari Fried12262% games+4.6% vs expected
Heather Morrow + Margaret Zheng12654% games+2.6% vs expected
Susan Kushibuchi + Akari Fried15557% games+2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Heather Morrow
88W–71L career · 7 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
4.21
4
Angie Nawalany
87W–28L career · 12 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Margaret Zheng
86W–80L career · 10 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Jill Lang
71W–31L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Akari Fried
73W–33L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Katie Stark
86W–49L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Victoria van Zile
75W–37L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
4
Lily Enquist
45W–38L career · type M · 14 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Kim Weyer
88W–87L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Laurie Hofmann
27W–30L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Susan Kushibuchi
40W–38L career · 7 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Michele Soelling
26W–24L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
Linda Fletcher
38W–26L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.