Search

Margaret Russ

Bellevue, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
96 matches · 59W–37L · seasons 20212026
Where Margaret sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Margaret is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Margaret has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Margaret has gone from the 7th to the 45th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 67.4% of games
3.5
85.7%
18W–3L · 58.6% of games
4.0
31%
9W–20L · 46.3% of games
8.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 55% of games
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 72.8% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history96 matches
L
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Chu
+0.005about as expected — took 48% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-7
L
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yasmeen Mar
0.029below expectation — took 43% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Anderson
0.010about as expected — took 61% of games against 63% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-02-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen Acuario
0.091below expectation — took 0% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen Acuario
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miho Slavik
0.076below expectation — took 44% of games against 69% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-01-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miho Slavik
+0.018better than expected — took 80% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-01-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mamie Takechi
+0.027better than expected — took 53% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-11-10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julia Pollock
+0.017better than expected — took 62% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2024-10-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberly Burton
0.059below expectation — took 33% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Cheryl Pleas / Linda Fletcher
2024-09-21 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberly Burton
+0.016better than expected — took 80% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2024-06-09 · #3 Doubles · with Marina Sebright
+0.017better than expected — took 45% of games against 39% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.