Search

Natalie Warner

year-end
71 matches · 24W–47L · seasons 20222026

Captains: add Natalie Warner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-06-01 · HBSQ-Ace Ace Baby-Ikeda · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Smolinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-26 · HBSQ-Ace Ace Baby-Ikeda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Naomi O'Leary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-15 · HBSQ-Brodersen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-16 · HBSQ-Brodersen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelley Brodersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-03-24 · HBSQ-Ace Ace Baby-Ikeda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Motomi Kudo-King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-07 · HBSQ-Ace Ace Baby-Ikeda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Bierlink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-03 · HBSQ-Ace Ace Baby-Ikeda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Jamison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-07-04 · Pua 2.5 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-05-28 · HBSQ-Ace Ace Baby-Ikeda · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Smolinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-05-21 · Pua 2.5 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-05-19 · HBSQ-Tang · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-05-13 · HBSQ-Ace Ace Baby-Ikeda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Jamison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
Teams18 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
61.5%
16W–10L · 54.5% of games
3.0
18.4%
7W–31L · 39.3% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 28.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert