← Search

Shelley Brodersen

Shoreline, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 37W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Shelley Brodersen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Jennifer Buma championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-05 · HBSQ-Vana · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Thornberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-22 · HBSQ-Brodersen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Chia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-05-21 · HBSQ-Brodersen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-20 · HBSQ-Vana · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Chun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-07 · HBSQ-Vana · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Combs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-01 · HBSQ-Vana · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kris Kadoshima
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · HBSQ-Brodersen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Chia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-24 · HBSQ-Vana · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Chun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · HBSQ-Brodersen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jolanta Grigsby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-16 · HBSQ-Brodersen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Warner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-10 · HBSQ-Brodersen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Korch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
37.7%
20W–33L · 46.9% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 48% of games
7.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 57.3% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.3% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
21 matches
#1 Singles
12%
10 matches
#2 Singles
8%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova