Search

Priscilla Cypiot

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
126 matches · 63W–63L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.03
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
34%
stay 3.0
66%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 77% stay · 23% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.94. Lower than today’s 3.03 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
46 of 144
WA · 3.0
190 of 755

Priscilla is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Priscilla has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Priscilla has gone from the 49th to the 47th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
60%
9W–6L · 55.1% of games
3.0
59.7%
37W–25L · 54% of games
6.0
50%
10W–10L · 51.3% of games
6.0mixed
24%
6W–19L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history126 matches
W
Lisa Williamson
2026-07-30 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.035below expectation — took 55% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Laura Borner / Elnaz Ansari
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Morgan Cunningham
+0.016better than expected — took 59% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Keshia Peters / Angela yang
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Yu
+0.003about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Stephanie Artati / Jennifer Eng
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elise Harper
0.067below expectation — took 14% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Yukevich
+0.005about as expected — took 52% of games against 51% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Lori Nelson / Elisse Priskila
2026-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marta Mendez Simon
+0.005about as expected — took 45% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
Vicky Dinh / My-Hong Truong
2026-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Yu
0.004about as expected — took 44% of games against 48% expected
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Yukevich
0.010below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Motoko Komatsubara / Allison Lindsay
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Yukevich
0.008about as expected — took 59% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Lynne Parrott / Leah Snyder
2026-02-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Schmidt
0.029below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Brook Koski / Alina Galan
2026-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexis Wood
0.001about as expected — took 56% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
Alison Shea / Bridget Haba
2026-01-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Morgan Cunningham
0.002about as expected — took 65% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.