← Teams

MAC-Stevenson/Jacobs

2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Christy MacColl
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Jennifer Stevenson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Julie Kafoury
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.07
Adrienne Dedelow
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.01
Kathleen Cooney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.89
Barbara Gram
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Amy Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Sharr Stark
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2025-03-16Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesSharr Stark / Melissa Jacobs vs Mary Jesse / Jeny Joseph6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCathy Koerner / Amy Thomas vs Beth Kempton / Gina Ariosa7-6, 6-1
2025-03-09Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesSharr Stark / Jeannine Jorgenson vs Amy Patton / Kristi Tompkins6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesAdrienne Dedelow vs Kendra Rothert6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMelissa Jacobs / Julie Kafoury vs Rachel Nies / Nancy Osborne6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBarbara Gram / Wendy Scott vs Paula Rossman / Josette Zervic6-3, 6-2
2025-03-02Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesMarcy Bernhardt / Julie Kafoury vs Julie LaMontagne / Kristen LaBarca6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMelissa Jacobs / Jennifer Stevenson vs Erin Gleason / Char Riley7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathleen Cooney / Angie Cunningham vs Nichole Anglin / Colleen Walker6-4, 7-6
2025-02-22Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMarcy Bernhardt / Julie Kafoury vs Cathy Gatzke / Timothea Barnatan7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesChristy MacColl vs Dolores Corley1-6, 0-2
W#3 DoublesSharr Stark / Amy Thomas vs Lyann Nguyen / Toni Eastwood6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2025-02-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesWendy Scott / Barbara Gram vs Katherine McMillan / Lauren Mang6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJeannine Jorgenson / Sharr Stark vs Jopie van Hameren / Jen Lewis6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesApril Paris / Jennifer Stevenson vs Astrid Andreu / Dayna Jahnke-Corwin6-4, 6-4
2025-02-09Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesBarbara Gram / Wendy Scott vs Garrene Mcgale / Nancy Osborne3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Cooney / Jennifer Stevenson vs Kendra Rothert / Whitney Mam7-5, 6-0
2025-02-02Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesSharr Stark / Jennifer Stevenson vs Candy Dann / Cathy Cervantez6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAngie Cunningham / Julie Kafoury vs Cathleen Lang / Mary Priester6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathleen Cooney / Melissa Jacobs vs Karen Kraus / Gretchen Newcomb7-5, 7-5
2025-01-03Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesSharr Stark / Cathy Koerner vs Michelle Johnson / Christine Bennett-Hanes6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesChristy MacColl vs Christina Melander7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJennifer Stevenson / Kathleen Cooney vs Erin Casey / Kaie Wellman6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBarbara Gram / April Paris vs Jean Zuber Marshburn / Shawn Sefchick6-0, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Christy MacColl
32W–13L career
0%85%15%
3.46
3.5
Jennifer Stevenson
91W–97L career
0%96%4%
3.41
3.5
Julie Kafoury
41W–6L career · type A
1%93%5%
3.33
3
Adrienne Dedelow
35W–35L career
0%62%38%
3.07
3.5
Kathleen Cooney
47W–71L career
31%69%0%
3.01
3
Barbara Gram
127W–129L career
0%97%3%
2.89
3
Amy Thomas
27W–46L career
1%89%10%
2.87
3
Sharr Stark
10W–28L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.