Search

Paul Laurent

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
130 matches · 68W–62L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.32
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
133 of 399
OR · 3.5
262 of 735

Paul is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams64 teams · 2007–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Paul has been a steady 3.5 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Paul has gone from the 35th to the 88th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
69.2%
36W–16L · 56.8% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
48.1%
13W–14L · 51.3% of games
7.0mixed
40.5%
15W–22L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history130 matches
L
2026-04-18 · IRV-Plowman/Walker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Traci Laurent
+0.000about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-04-18 · IRV-Laurent/Hoerster · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ben Hoerster
0.034below expectation — took 55% of games against 64% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · IRV-Laurent/Hoerster · #3 Doubles · with Ben Hoerster
+0.042better than expected — took 86% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-11 · IRV-Laurent/Hoerster · #3 Doubles · with Ben Hoerster
+0.032better than expected — took 63% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-29 · IRV-Plowman/Walker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Traci Laurent
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 5-6
W
2026-03-14 · N OR-IRV-Laurent · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Naugler
0.004about as expected — took 67% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-08 · N OR-IRV-Laurent · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Murray
0.023below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · N OR-IRV-Laurent · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Streich
0.046below expectation — took 58% of games against 72% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Mark Beilstein / Matthew van Osdol
2026-01-25 · N OR-IRV-Laurent · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Slavin
+0.014better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Jim DeWeese / Daniel M Kim
2026-01-17 · N OR-IRV-Laurent · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Murray
+0.045better than expected — took 68% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-11-08 · IRV-Harris · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Streich
+0.030better than expected — took 63% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Jon Bryant / Sam Lumetta
2025-10-04 · IRV-Harris · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jonathan Steinhoff
+0.010about as expected — took 46% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.