← Search

Katherine Kralj

Gresham, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
259 matches · 142W–117L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Katherine Kralj to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history259 matches
L
2026-09-13 · CAC-McAra · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Lewis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-14 · CAC-McAra · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Haihua Su
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · CAC-McAra · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Crystal Bryant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-05 · CAC-Birkhofer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Lovett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-05-03 · CAC-McAra · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-30 · CAC-Birkhofer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marie Picard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-25 · CAC-McAra · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Crystal Bryant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-17 · CAC-Birkhofer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Liz DelPlato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-04-12 · CAC-McAra · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Jobe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-27 · CAC-Birkhofer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donna Roisom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-21 · CAC-Delplato · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Picard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
Julie Hansen / Julie Bradford
2026-03-13 · CAC-Birkhofer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janet Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams89 teams · 2013–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
48.8%
40W–42L · 50.6% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 46.8% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 78.7% of games
8.0
68.2%
45W–21L · 57.6% of games
9.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
48.3%
29W–31L · 50.5% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
97 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
96 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
65 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams