Search

Alexis Pond

Beaverton, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
42 matches · 20W–22L · seasons 20252026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.64
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
4%
down to 3.5
96%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Beaverton · 4.0
21 of 42
OR · 4.0
330 of 498

Alexis is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Alexis has been a steady 4.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.54.020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Alexis has gone from the 40th to the 55th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
53.3%
16W–14L · 50.4% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mckenna Selbak
0.022below expectation — took 60% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mckenna Selbak
0.033below expectation — took 37% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mckenna Selbak
+0.016better than expected — took 43% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mckenna Selbak
+0.031better than expected — took 55% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Davis
+0.022better than expected — took 53% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mckenna Selbak
0.028below expectation — took 52% of games against 63% expected
7-6, 4-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mckenna Selbak
0.018below expectation — took 37% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mckenna Selbak
0.023below expectation — took 57% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-7
L
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mckenna Selbak
0.004about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mckenna Selbak
0.010about as expected — took 75% of games against 70% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mckenna Selbak
+0.016better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mckenna Selbak
0.001about as expected — took 68% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.