← Search

Courtney Pierce

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 40W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Courtney Pierce to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
W
2026-07-29 · Summer Sets · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Hasle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-23 · Summer Sets · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Doherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-17 · Summer Sets · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-05 · Summer Sets · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darci Keljo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-24 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deana Julka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Meagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-14 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-07 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darci Keljo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-02-15 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Doherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-01-03 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darci Keljo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-03-16 · MAC-Pickard/Lovett · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geraldine Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-02-23 · MAC-Pickard/Lovett · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Metcalf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2013–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
61.8%
34W–21L · 54.8% of games
4.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
11 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams