← Search

Nancy Stecher

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oregon City, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 22W–22L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history44 matches
W
2026-10-18 · SHC-Lake/Welter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Eargle
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-10-11 · SHC-Lake/Welter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Macdonald
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-09-26 · SHC-Lake/Welter · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Griffin
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-21 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Griffin championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-12 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Griffin championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-13 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Semon
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-17 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Semon
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-01-03 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Maguire
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-11-22 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Griffin
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Default
2025-11-15 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maggie Creps Weaver
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-11-08 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maggie Creps Weaver
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-25 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris van Leeuwen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
40.9%
9W–13L · 47.3% of games
7.0
59.1%
13W–9L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
10 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams