Search

Maggie Creps Weaver

Lake Oswego, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
28 matches · 16W–12L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.33
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
2%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 3.5
18 of 60
OR · 3.5
249 of 739

Maggie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams27 teams · 2008–2026
SHC-Welter/Eargle
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2026
N OR-SHC-Zielinski
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
SHC-Hobi
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
N OR-SHC-Hobi
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
LOTC-McCarter/Nguyen
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
SHC-Zielinski
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Maggie has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.02020202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Maggie has gone from the 30th to the 98th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 55.4% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 32.9% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.4% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history28 matches
W
Renea Johnson / Jill Gardner
2026-05-09 · SHC-Hobi · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheena Raffaele
0.020about as expected — took 67% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-02 · SHC-Hobi · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheena Raffaele
0.015below expectation — took 44% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · SHC-Hobi · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiersten Lake
+0.014better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-29 · SHC-Hobi · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Griffin
+0.014better than expected — took 86% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-01-17 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Welter
+0.006better than expected — took 86% of games against 71% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-01-09 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Welter
0.051below expectation — took 59% of games against 74% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-11-22 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Murphy
0.021below expectation — took 38% of games against 49% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-11-15 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Stecher
+0.026better than expected — took 100% of games against 73% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-11-08 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Stecher
+0.010about as expected — took 55% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-25 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Eargle
+0.019better than expected — took 80% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-09-20 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Murphy
0.060below expectation — took 20% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-09-13 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Murphy
0.023below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.