← Search

Maribeth Cadieux

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
West Linn, OR
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 9W–7L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history16 matches
W
2026-10-10 · MPRC-Skoog/Nies · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandie Yamauchi
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-10-03 · MPRC-Skoog/Nies · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandie Yamauchi
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-22 · MPRC-Lanier/Noble · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanna Conan
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-04-06 · MPRC-Lanier/Noble · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanna Conan
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-10-19 · MPRC-Vos/Grant · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanna Conan
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2024-09-15 · MPRC-Vos/Grant · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanna Conan
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
L
2024-06-21 · MPRC-Skoog/Noble · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanna Conan
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2024-06-02 · MPRC-Skoog/Noble · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Devrie Brennan
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2024-04-13 · MPRC-Skoog/Noble · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Devrie Brennan
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2022-10-22 · MPRC-Vos/Grant · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Molly Taylor
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2022-10-16 · MPRC-Vos/Grant · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanna Conan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
L
2019-11-17 · MPRC-Tompkins/Osborne · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Orlandini
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 53.4% of games
7.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 56% of the time
#3 Doubles
56%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer