Search

Sharr Stark

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
38 matches · 10W–28L · seasons 20192025
Where Sharr sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Sharr is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams32 teams · 2011–2025
MAC-Stevenson
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
MAC-Stevenson/Jacobs
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
MAC-Bounds/Popma
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2024
MAC-Bounds/Popma
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2024
MAC-Cooney/Hopson
2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2023
MAC-Cooney/Hopson
2023 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sharr has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Sharr has gone from the 5th to the 5th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
27.8%
10W–26L · 40.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history38 matches
L
2025-06-20 · MAC-Stevenson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeannine Jorgenson
0.019below expectation — took 32% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
2025-05-04 · MAC-Stevenson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Jacobs
0.016below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Joanna Conan / Maribeth Cadieux
2025-04-06 · MAC-Stevenson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Koerner
0.009below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-03-16 · MAC-Stevenson/Jacobs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Jacobs
0.024below expectation — took 41% of games against 52% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Amy Patton / Kristi Tompkins
2025-03-09 · MAC-Stevenson/Jacobs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeannine Jorgenson
+0.029better than expected — took 65% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
2025-02-22 · MAC-Stevenson/Jacobs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Thomas
+0.037better than expected — took 50% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L
Jopie van Hameren / Jen Lewis
2025-02-16 · MAC-Stevenson/Jacobs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeannine Jorgenson
0.011below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-02-02 · MAC-Stevenson/Jacobs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Stevenson
0.044below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-01-03 · MAC-Stevenson/Jacobs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Koerner
0.011below expectation — took 14% of games against 30% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-06-14 · MAC-Bounds/Popma · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Cooney
0.001about as expected — took 47% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2024-05-18 · MAC-Bounds/Popma · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy MacColl
0.014below expectation — took 44% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-05-11 · MAC-Bounds/Popma · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Cooney
+0.019about as expected — took 38% of games against 34% expected
7-5, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.