← Teams

SJRC-Lochner

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.45 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Dana Baioni
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.47
Michelle Posey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Christy Buckman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Lisa Howlett
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Caroline Popma
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Kristin Campbell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Nicolle Lochner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Kathleen Cooney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.84
Wendy Hill
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Sharr Stark
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results6 ties
2021-05-08Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesMichelle Posey / Caroline Popma vs Erin Hill / Jennie Brawn6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKristin Campbell vs Paula Jacobson7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNicolle Lochner / Christy Buckman vs Janice Ackley / Michele Snyder6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesDana Baioni vs Tanya Wong5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-04-23Lost 2–3
W#1 DoublesChristine Brecht / Michelle Posey vs Cheri Martes Davis / Alison Marr6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristin Campbell vs Ashley Schneider6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWendy Hill / Sharr Stark vs Diana Blebea / Tonya Halog6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDana Baioni vs Vivian Nguyen2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNicolle Lochner / Dana Petrusich vs Stephanie Arnheim / Jackie Konen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-17Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDana Baioni / Caroline Popma vs Casey Billings / Holly Kanz7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesNicolle Lochner / Christy Buckman vs KEELEY PLOMBON / Joy Meyers2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLisa Howlett vs Tina Farrelly6-1, 6-2
2021-04-10Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesDana Baioni / Michelle Posey vs Casey Billings / Carly Vendegna6-3, 6-5
W#2 DoublesSharr Stark / Lisa Howlett vs Gabriela McIntosh / Elizabeth Schwarz7-6, 5-4
L#2 SinglesKristin Campbell vs Colleen Nolan6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDana Petrusich / Caroline Popma vs Tina Farrelly / Kimberly Parks7-6, 4-3
2021-03-27Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesKathleen Cooney / Christine Brecht vs Patricia Sturr / Karen Groenweghe6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSharr Stark / Wendy Hill vs Janet Hostetler / Kathi Gray5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLisa Howlett vs Swathi Karlapati6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKristin Campbell / Cathy Koerner vs Karen Harris / Jodee Midura6-3, 6-3
2021-03-20Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesDana Baioni / Michelle Posey vs Garrene Mcgale / Colleen Kellogg6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristine Brecht / Kathleen Cooney vs Leslie Lynch / Janet Rhoades7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLisa Howlett vs Reiko Maeda7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNicolle Lochner / Wendy Hill vs Dar Dragoon / Sheryl Riley6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Dana Baioni
123W–127L career
0%84%17%
3.49
4
Michelle Posey
76W–43L career
45%55%0%
3.47
3.5
Christy Buckman
30W–33L career
1%97%2%
3.31
3.5
Lisa Howlett
31W–21L career · type S
6%91%4%
3.26
3.5
Caroline Popma
45W–30L career
11%89%0%
3.16
3.5
Kristin Campbell
32W–52L career
10%90%0%
3.13
3.5
Nicolle Lochner
36W–73L career
25%74%1%
3.09
3.5
Kathleen Cooney
47W–71L career
31%69%0%
3.01
3
Wendy Hill
34W–48L career
0%96%3%
2.84
3
Sharr Stark
10W–28L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.